Top 10 JavaScript Frameworks to Use in 2022

Introduction

Being a multi-paradigm language, JavaScript maintains programming styles that are managed by events, functional, concentrated on objects, and oriented on prototypes. In the beginning, JavaScript was utilized just on the side of a customer. Still, nowadays, it is also utilized as a programming language on the side of a server.

This makes JavaScript the language of the entire internet. It is worth mentioning that JavaScript is not the only language available on the internet. Nevertheless, it is quite widespread and this led to the occurrence of popular JavaScript frameworks.

Everything has its advantages and disadvantages. Thus, if you tap here, it enables you to determine the benefits of staff augmentation and when it will be suitable the most. The same refers to JavaScript frameworks for a reason they have their own pros and cons. Let’s consider the definition of a JavaScript framework and look at the top JavaScript frameworks to utilize in 2022.

Determination of JavaScript Framework

A web elaboration framework is an abstraction in which software granting common functions can be selectively transformed by extra code written by the user. A JavaScript framework is an app framework created in JavaScript where programmers are able to play around with functionality and utilize them at their own discretion.

It is better to adapt frameworks to web design. This is one of the main reasons for website developers to utilize them. With the assistance of frameworks, working with JavaScript becomes simpler and smoother. A large number of possibilities are offered such as adaptability of applications to devices.

List of the Best JavaScript Frameworks

There is no doubt that JavaScript is an important element of the digital world. Some may wonder what makes it so popular. How do you think recognizable applications such as Facebook, Netflix, Uber, LinkedIn, and Candy Crush were made from? You are right, this is a merit of JavaScript.

Now it becomes simpler to understand exactly why JavaScript has a number of frameworks. The majority of them are open source and free. Thus, if you do not know what JavaScript framework to utilize, we have a list of options for you that include features, pros, cons, etc.

1. Angular

Being an open-source framework and one of the most popular JavaScript frameworks, Angular is utilized for Single Page Application (SPA) development. Angular is very testable and grants easier DOM manipulation. Still, there are some disadvantages present as well. For example, performance problems are possible. Moreover, if you are a newcomer, there are some Angular features that can appear complicated for you to understand.

This JavaScript framework was developed by Google and is best utilized for the front end of the MEAN stack. Angular provides developers with a number of integrated libraries and instruments to test, elaborate, and make updates to their code.

2. Vue

Vue was created in 2014 and its development is connected with Google as well. The reason is that the Vue framework was elaborated on by a former Google worker named Evan You. Vue includes a combination of the best functions of Angular and React frameworks.

This is a lightweight and fast framework. It possesses extensive documentation. Despite Vue having comparatively fewer components, this JavaScript framework is selected by developers for its numerous features. Moreover, it is a free and open-source framework.

3. React

React refers to a type of JavaScript library. It is likewise free and open source like previous representatives. The React framework was developed by the Facebook community and Jordan Walke is still considered its original author.

React is best utilized as a basis for creating single-page or mobile applications. This is one of the easiest-to-learn frameworks. Moreover, it is SEO-friendly and includes reusable components. Unfortunately, for some developers documentation may be a problem. Despite this, React is gaining popularity fast and is utilized for the development and operation of the dynamic User Interface of web pages with high incoming traffic

4. Ember

Ember Core Team with the original author Yehuda Katz created the Ember framework in 2015. It started to be a popular, free and open-source framework pretty fast. Ember supports two-way data binding. This is what makes it a trustworthy platform for coping with challenging User Interfaces.

If we compare it with frontend frameworks, Ember is complicated to learn and is a highly opinionated framework. Moreover, it will not be suitable for smaller projects. Nevertheless, LinkedIn, Netflix, and Nordstrom are several popular websites that utilize Ember for their work.

5. Backbone

Created by Jeremy Ashkenas, Backbone is another free and open-source framework. Among its main advantages can be highlighted: lightweight, fast, flexible, and easy to integrate. Among other problems, debugging can occur. Also, Backbone is somewhat opinionated.

If we google js libraries, Backbone will surely be recommended since it is quite easy to learn. Single Page Applications can be created with their assistance. Backbone is best used as a JavaScript library to give structure to web applications.

6. Aurelia

Despite the Aurelia framework being difficult to learn, it is helpful for the development of more robust websites. The syntax is very readable and Aurelia possesses extensive documentation. Being a free and open-source framework, Aurelia is most suitable as a modern front-end framework. With its help, the creation of cross-platform applications becomes possible.

7. Svelte

Rich Harris as an original author together with the Svelte core team developed another free and open-source web framework. With this framework of js applications are becoming simplified to create. As a result, fast and static web applications can be developed.

Svelte is fittest as a compiler for creating web UI components. It also operates directly on the code without a DOM. Moreover, Svelte needs less code. This saves time greatly for developers who spend it on writing code.

8. Node

Node is a JavaScript run-time environment on the side of the server. It is free, open-source, and can operate on cross-platforms. Node is easy to learn and possesses high performance. Still, Node may be complicated to maintain code. Also, there is a set of untested or poor-quality tools. Regardless of this, Node can be used in a back-end runtime environment that executes JS outside a web browser.

9. Meteor

Being created by Meteor Software, this JavaScript framework received a corresponding title. Meteor acts best as an isomorphic framework for fast prototyping and creating cross-platform code. It is easy to learn and provides developers with several conveniences. Meteor is likewise a free and open-source framework.

10. Mithril

Mithril is an easy-to-learn and lightweight JavaScript MVC framework. While other frameworks provide developers with more features, Mithril can boast of good performance. Unfortunately, Mithril is not a widely utilized client-side JavaScript framework. Still, it is suitable for Single-Page Applications development.

Summing-Up

Frameworks are handy for making web development simpler. The process of elaboration of an application with JavaScript frameworks becomes quicker. They grant developers libraries, documentation, and resources that can be utilized to create more effective digital experiences. Being a frontend developer, you are probably confused by a number of various frameworks.

There is no need to worry since you can familiarize yourself with the top JavaScript frameworks mentioned previously anytime you prefer.

Select the fittest frameworks for you and start learning them today!

Suggested Articles

Top 30 Platforms to Learn React in 2022 [For Beginners]
React vs Vue: What to Choose in 2022?
Caching NextJS Apps with Serverless Redis using Upstash

The post Top 10 JavaScript Frameworks to Use in 2022 appeared first on Flatlogic Blog.

Generate Full-Stack Web Apps Based on Database Schema

Hello! Flatlogic has added one more important feature: ready-made web application scheme integration. Check out our release notes to learn more about our latest product enhancements.

Previously, Flatlogic web app generator allowed you to model a database schema from scratch. We received a lot of requests from our users who had already modelled DB schemas and found it inconvenient to manually remodel the schema in Flatlogic schema editor.

To eliminate this obstacle and increase our users’ satisfaction, we are introducing a new platform feature: Creating the web app schema from a SQL dump. The feature supports both Postgres and MySQL dialects and identifies tables and column types, also trying to discover relations based on index, reference and constraint information. “users” table is automatically added to the DB model to preserve web app user management functionality. If the “users” table already exists in the imported DB, the column lists of the two tables are merged. SQL import is invoked by simply uploading the SQL dump file, literally in one click.

We recommend that you choose “Structure only, no data” mode when dumping the SQL from your database, otherwise the data dump will result in unnecessary volume uploads which sometimes could be huge and even lead to upload failure.

After the successful file upload and schema import, the schema editor allows you to review and edit the schema, and correct names and column types in case those were not identified correctly by the SQL dump parser. Also you can add one-to-many (relation one) and many-to-many (relation many) relation types if such were not discovered automatically.

Flatlogic schema editor also allows you to extend your existing DB schema while keeping all the data intact by applying our generated migrations feature.

Enjoy this new feature and model Admin web apps for your existing database literally in one click!

Click here to learn more about upcoming features. Here you’ll see some info about Flatlogic plans and some points from the roadmap.

The post Generate Full-Stack Web Apps Based on Database Schema appeared first on Flatlogic Blog.

React vs Vue: What to Choose in 2022?

React and Vue are the two most popular and widely used JavaScript frontend frameworks today. These frameworks allow developers to create a wide variety of web applications with JavaScript. Choosing between the two can be confusing if you are building a new application. Each has its own use case and serves different business needs. 

Most web developers prefer to use Vue.js and React frameworks. Using React or Vue.js provides a quality approach to web development that is consistent and performant. Both Vue and React have their own best scripts and meet different kinds of business needs.

In this article, we will learn about each and explore which is best suited for your business.

What is React?

React.js combines a high degree of concentration with simplicity when it comes to user experience. It was developed by Facebook as an open-source JavaScript library to help developers build user interfaces. React follows a declarative programming style and a component-based approach. It allows for the creation of complex web applications with the highest flexibility and speed. 

React.js is the most used web framework in 2021 with 40.14% of the software developers globally using React. 

React holds the top spot for the fourth year. Popular companies that are currently using React.js are AirBnB, Netflix, Instagram, and Udemy.

Source: https://2021.stateofjs.com/en-US/libraries/front-end-frameworks

What is Vue.js?

Vue.js is a progressive JavaScript framework that developers use to build interfaces. Unlike the Angular framework, Vue is incrementally adaptable by design. It scales easily between a library and a fully-featured framework. Companies using Vue.js include GitLab, Behance, Upwork, and Grammarly.

Here are a few Vue.js statistics

Vue.js is used by 0.8% of all the websites amongst JavaScript libraries.
Vue.js is used by 1.2% of all the websites amongst the JavaScript library we know and that rank in the top 1,000,000.
In 2021, 42% of the developers admitted that they used Vue in their company. 55% of the developers are of the view that Vue will get more popular in their organization. 

What are the Similarities between React and Vue?

Before looking at the differences between the two, let us look at some similarities. Both React and Vue possess component-based architecture. Also, both the frameworks are lightweight and have an exposure to lifecycle methods. Their performance is fairly similar. Both technologies work with any existing web application, even if it’s not a Single Page Application.

Below are some similarities:

They have composable and reactive view components
They use virtual DOM
JavaScript Code and PWA support
They concentrate on a core library. They also involve handling of routing and global state management with companion libraries
Possibility of working with any existing web applications
Both React and Vue have large proactive communities and plenty of libraries and tools available.

Comparison between React and Vue

You can pick one after knowing how they differ. The most obvious distinction: React is a library, whereas Vue is a framework.

Let us compare them taking into account some essential parameters. 

Data Binding 

Vue uses two-way data binding. It means whenever you change any interface element, your model state automatically changes with it. It may look simple to read about it. However, for a large project, it is not. If you want a good data overview and want easy debugging, you may prefer React as it has one-way data binding. After the model state is updated, React then renders the change in the interface element.

Desktop and Mobile Development 

React Native is the perfect platform for you if you want to build mobile apps that work on Android or iOS. Developers can use their existing skills to get started. The biggest advantage of using React is that you can reuse 99% of code between Android and iOS.

On the other hand, Vue does not have a dedicated platform like React Native. However, it does not mean you cannot develop native applications. Vue developers can use a cross-platform UI framework or plugins and write Vue applications and compile them into native apps – iOS and Android.

Major Differentiator – Syntax

One of the major differences between them is the way the view layer is built. Vue uses HTML templates by default, and there is no option to write in JavaScript Expressions (JSX). On the other hand, React solely uses JSX. Vue is easier to use even for beginner frontend developers as it uses only HTML. React’s JavaScript Expressions combine CSS and HTML into JavaScript. The XML-like syntax allows developers to create self-contained UI components with view-rendering instructions included.

Tooling

React provides third-party tools to help developers create React apps, and it allows them to speed up app development by adding scripts. Earlier, React developers had to copy the files from previous apps and configure everything from zero. It was not only time-consuming but a boring task that no developer liked doing. 

Vue, on the other hand, uses a tool called Vue CLI. It enables the user to create any project quickly. It comes with many benefits like easy improvements, adding plugins anytime during the project, etc.

Popularity

It is not easy to pick a winner on popularity, but if you check online communities, React wins this battle. It is mainly because it is backed by Facebook. The Vue community is smaller compared to React with fewer packages and resources. However, it is maintained by the creator himself – Evan You and his team.

Template and Styling

The UI library is incomplete without templates and styles. Additionally, they’re the places where the difference between React and Vue is most apparent, since the code design is different. The approaches both Vue and React take are also quite different.

While Vue has a more declarative approach, React is more functional. Since the logic and markup are both considered as one, they are mixed. It is accomplished with JSX, which is an abstraction of React.createElement, which is used to create Virtual DOM entities. 

Templates and styles are treated separately with Vue – a more conservative approach. Here, the templates are viewed as old-fashioned HTML elements.

Performance

If you want to make the decision of choosing anyone between Vue and React based on performance, you will not be able to since both frameworks have remarkable speed. However, as mentioned at the start, you can check for specific use cases to decide which is a better option for you.

Learn more about Vue.js Best Use Cases 

Vue has to be integrated into an existing project incrementally. This means there is a per project requirement since it is a progressive framework. For example, you can use Vue.js as a lightweight library to add some interactivity to a web app. Ease of integration is one of Vue’s top assets. 

You can hire Vue js developer to easily implement Vue.js into a project – it is a lot faster. The learning curve is easy, and tools like Vue UI and CLI make it a great tool to use for quick MVP delivery and start-up ideas. It is a cost-effective solution for all small to medium applications. However, it does not mean it is not good for large web apps. It has a vast ecosystem of tools and companion libraries, allowing the framework to respond to the complex needs of enterprise-grade applications.

Learn more about React.js Best Use Cases 

React was initially created for large-scale web projects, and hence using it for a small and simple app would not justify its usage. Setting up a project using React.js is not easy, and you need some level of expertise to do it, but its architecture ultimately pays off in the long run.

JSX is powerful, and it gives developers a range of powers – flow controls and advanced IDE features such as auto-completion or listing are included in the component view templates. React does not have official packages for routing or state management like Vue. If you are developing complex apps, you have to use third-party solutions in many places. It gives a range of choices to developers. If you have experienced developers, they will know better which libraries are optimum and can be used to meet the business demands of a particular web application.

Choose a framework/library according to your needs

React is a library, and hence the users gain more control, such as the manual re-rendering control. The library heavily utilizes functional programming principles, which is evident in how it handles state and communicates between components. On the contrary, Vue is a framework that brings to the table many more built-in features and companion libraries which come from the core team. Hence, this helps in making the development experience smoother for the user.

Both Vue and React are great tools for building interactive user interfaces. You cannot pick one randomly, you will need to take into account many factors like your business needs, developers’ experience, budget, timeframe to deliver the project, and much more. Performance-wise both are at par, and you won’t be disappointed in this aspect whether you choose React or Vue.

Suggested Articles

Vue vs React: What is Easier? What is Trending? [Detailed Guide with +/-]
What is Vue?
12 Best React Admin Templates Under $100

The post React vs Vue: What to Choose in 2022? appeared first on Flatlogic Blog.

Bob Ross Ipsum

There is a “Lorem ipsum” generator built right into Emmet, which we enable on CodePen by default. So if you type lorem-Tab, you’ll get some.

Good to know: you can customize how much you get of it by adding numbers. lorem10 is just 10 words of filler text. lorem1000 is 1,000 words of filler text.

Lorem ipsum is just gibberish (it’s not really Latin!) and the point of it is putting placeholder text in place when it doesn’t really matter what it says, you’re just designing something. If it’s going to be real text at some point, it’s probably a good idea to get your hands on that real text, but alas, sometimes placeholder copy will do.

Someone asked me today if any of the “other” filler text generators could be used on CodePen. Others? There are lots of fun ones, actually. A few favorites of mine: Cupcake Ipsum, Bacon Ipsum, and Samuel L. Ipsum. Their favorite? Bob Ross Lipsum.

So can you make happy little filler text happen on CodePen? Sure, and you can make it happen yourself by using custom snippets. The trick is to head to your editor settings and add a brand new HTML snippet.

Added two Bob Ross snippets

To avoid any text weirdness, I’m wrapping the text in curly braces and escaping the quotes.

{Hello, World! It[backslash]‘s a nice day out.}

And then, KAPOW, we got options.

The post Bob Ross Ipsum appeared first on CodePen Blog.

369: With Chris Smith

This week I got to speak with Chris Smith! We got to talk about all sorts of things from blogging, to pushing the boundaries of CSS, to logic in CSS, to digging into some of Chris’ most interesting Pens, to Chris’ actual favorite Pen of all time.

Time Jumps

Sponsor: React Summit

Ken Wheeler, Tejas Kumar, Sara Vieira, Tanner Linsley – these are just a few of the names coming to this year’s React Summit, the biggest React conference worldwide. Discover the future of the React and meet thousands of front-end and full-stack engineers!

The format of the event will be hybrid. The first day, June 17, will be streamed from the Amsterdam venue. The second day, June 21, and numerous free workshops will be streamed to the global audience online.

Would you like to participate? Get 10% off on remote & in-person tickets with our discount code CodePen.

The post 369: With Chris Smith appeared first on CodePen Blog.

Live View Iframe Sizing

Lee Martin had a good idea here. On CodePen’s Live View, we use a parent<iframe> to listen for updates to the Pen and then inject them or refresh the preview automatically. But that parent <iframe> can be tricky to size.

For example, on iOS, the height of the iframe was as tall as the content inside it and you can no control at all over that. In recent versions of iOS, that seems fixed. But we ran into a new problem. We sized the iframe to be as tall as the browser window by setting height: 100vh. That mostly works, but unfortunately, browser UI could sometimes overlap the bottom. That seems incredibly silly, but that’s the way it is. Fortunately, there is a brand new CSS things called dynamic viewport units, and Bramus has a good rundown. Now we’re (progressively) setting height: 100svh or the “Small Viewport”:

The Small Viewport is the viewport sized assuming any UA interfaces that are dynamically expanded and retracted to be *expanded*.

It looks like “dynamic” viewport units could have worked as well, but “small” seemed to work the same here and somehow feels safer. This is on production now, but see this video as I was kinda sorting this out:

Test Pen

Felt like an appropriate thing to work on for Global Accessibility Awareness Day (GAAD).

The post Live View Iframe Sizing appeared first on CodePen Blog.

368: Lea Rosema

I got to talk with Lea Rosema this week! She’s an incredibly talented digital artist and front-end developer. She does quite a bit of art with some of the trickiest web technology out there: shaders! But rather than just learn it and use it, she helps other people learn and get more out of it. Several times that has taken the shape of Web Components. For example, a <shader-art> Web Component that takes some of the boilerplate work out of designing with them. See this Collection of examples.

Time Jumps

00:44 Guest introduction

03:38 Shaders

07:39 How does the shader work?

13:30 Sponsor: JS Nation

14:15 Dealing with strange looking code languages

17:53 What drew you to working in this tech?

20:20 Slider plugin

23:53 Half tone circle Pen

26:12 Magic Pixels

27:17 State of my brain Pen

28:37 Wandering through a twilight landscape Pen

Sponsor: JS Nation

Evan You, Kyle Simpson, Addy Osmani, Sarah Drasner – these are just a few of the speakers coming to this year’s JSNation, a 2-day conference focusing exclusively on JavaScript development. Discover the future of the JavaScript ecosystem and get connected to its stellar crowd! The format of the event will be hybrid. The first day (June 16) will be streamed from the Amsterdam venue. The second day (June 20) & numerous free workshops will be streamed to the global audience online.

Would you like to participate? Get 10% off on remote & in-person tickets with our discount code CodePen.

The post 368: Lea Rosema appeared first on CodePen Blog.

One Weird Trick to Try @parcel/css on CodePen

Ideally, we’d just offer @parcel/css as a CSS processor choice right in our editors. We could absolutely do that, but we’re smack in the middle of a bunch of next-gen CodePen stuff, and we’re keeping our efforts focused there. Never fear, interesting new processors like this will be there along with it. But this CSS processor caught my eye especially because it’s a very fresh, modern, and interesting take on CSS processing. It handles vendor prefixing on its own (something you might otherwise use Autoprefixer for), it handles “syntax lowering” (love that term) for future-syntax CSS (like you’d use postcss-preset-env for), offers scoping, and even has its own built-in minifier, while being super fast. Nice!

So what if you do wanna try it on CodePen? Well, it’s actually possible because they have cleverly released the processor with a Wasm option, not just a backend-language-only thing. So here’s the plan:

Load the processor in the browser as a script (go Wasm go!)
Pull the CSS from the current Pen
Pass that CSS to the in-browser processor we just loaded
Get the transformed CSS
Replace the CSS in the preview with the transformed CSS

Check it:

CodePen Embed Fallback

The post One Weird Trick to Try @parcel/css on CodePen appeared first on CodePen Blog.

iframe Security is So Strange

As I write, this is the attribute soup on an <iframe> on CodePen in order to dial in the right combination of security and usability:

<iframe

sandbox=”allow-downloads allow-forms allow-modals allow-pointer-lock allow-popups allow-presentation allow-same-origin allow-scripts allow-top-navigation-by-user-activation”

allow=”accelerometer; camera; encrypted-media; display-capture; geolocation; gyroscope; microphone; midi; clipboard-read; clipboard-write; web-share”

allowpaymentrequest=”true”
allowfullscreen=”true”>

</iframe>

Wow! I think that’s an awful lot of detailed HTML to get right. If any little bit of that was wrong, we’d hear about it here at CodePen right away. It would break what users expect to work.

To compound this issue, the above code is just the output for Chrome-n-friends. Both Safari and Firefox need variations of this HTML to perfect. That puts us in UA-sniffing territory, which is never a particularly happy place.

Add extra attributes or values to this code, you might make annoying extra console noise — quite annoying in an app for developers. Skip them, and you cripple the app itself. We have no choice but to render user code in an <iframe>, for all the obvious cross-origin security it provides.

Compounding things again, all this code changes. New features arrive in browsers that require new iframe permissions. But there is no good place to follow all the changes, so the way we tend to find out is when a user graciously sends in a support request for something that doesn’t work that they think should.

The code itself is just… strange! Why is sandbox space-separated but allow is semicolon-separated? Why are sandbox and allow different attributes at all? Especially when they are both whitelists? Why are some features their own special attributes?

Just feels like an awful lot of weirdness for one isolated purpose.

I was just looking over our setup here at CodePen and refactoring it a bit, and decided to chuck the attributes in JSON to maintain from there, so here’s a copy of that in case it’s useful to anyone else.

The post iframe Security is So Strange appeared first on CodePen Blog.

367: With Micah Godbolt

I got to talk with Micah Godbolt this week! Micah is is a long-hauler at Microsoft working on Design Systems and such. His CodePen account looks a lot like mine: steady consistent usage of “just trying to figure something out” Pens sprinkled with some ideas that somehow seem to click with the wider front-end world. I found it fascinating that putting the word “Design Systems” into his book title “Front-end Architecture for Design Systems” was suggested by the publisher, and they were right! Turns out the term Design Systems clicked a lot harder since the 2016 publication and I’m sure hasn’t hurt sales!

Time Jumps

00:35 Guest introduction

02:46 Front end architecture for design systems

06:31 Building design systems

10:23 Sponsor: Linode

11:08 You don’t need a UI framework

17:49 Responsive multi-level nav pen

19:30 Multi height equal column pen

23:01 How do you ship components?

27:00 Testing for bugs

28:41 Consistently making pens

35:13 Creating a stripped down use case

40:06 Where can people find out more

Sponsor: Linode

Visit linode.com/codepen and see why over a million developers trust Linode for the infrastructure.  From their award-winning support (offered 24/7/365 to every level of user) to ease of use and set up; it’s clear why developers have been trusting Linode for projects both big and small since 2003.   Linode offers the industry’s best price-to-performance value for all compute instances, including shared, dedicated, high memory, and GPUs. Linode makes cloud computing simple, affordable, and accessible allowing you to focus on your customers, not your infrastructure.  Visit linode.com/codepen, create a free account and you’ll get $100 in credit.

The post 367: With Micah Godbolt appeared first on CodePen Blog.