jQuery lives on; major changes teased

#​639 — May 18, 2023

Read on the Web

JavaScript Weekly

Bun’s New Bundler: 220x Faster than webpack?Bun is one of the newest JavaScript runtimes (built atop the JavaScriptCore engine) and focuses on speed while aiming to be a drop-in replacement for Node.js. This week’s v0.6.0 release is the ‘biggest release yet’ with standalone executable generation and more, but its new JavaScript bundler and minifier may attract most of the attention and this post digs into why.

Jarred Sumner

???? If you’d prefer to read what a third party thinks, Shane O’Sullivan gave the new bundler a spin and shared his thoughts. There’s also some discussion on Hacker News. It’s early days and while esbuild may be fast enough for most right now, it’s fantastic to see any progress in bundling.

Deopt Explorer: A VS Code Extension to Inspect V8 Trace Log Info — A thorough introduction to MS’s new tool for performing analysis of the V8 engine’s internals, including CPU profile data, how inline caches operate, deoptimizations, how functions were run (interpreted or compiled) and more. There’s a lot going on.

Ron Buckton (Microsoft)

Supercharge Your Websites and Applications with Cloudflare — Get ready for supercharged speed and reliability with Cloudflare’s suite of performance tools. With ultra-fast CDN, smart traffic routing, media optimization, and more, Cloudflare has everything you need to ensure your site or app runs at peak performance.

Cloudflare sponsor

jQuery 3.7.0 Released — JavaScript Weekly is 638 issues old, or almost 13 years once you take away weeks off, so jQuery was a big deal in our early days. We hold a lot of nostalgia for it, and it remains widely used even if no-one is writing about it anymore ???? v3.7 folds the Sizzle selector engine into the core, adds some unitless CSS properties, gains a new uniqueSort method, and “major changes” are still promised in future. jQuery lives on!

Timmy Willison (jQuery Foundation)

⚡️ IN BRIEF:

TC39’s Hemanth.HM has begun keeping a list of ES2023 code examples like he did for ES2022, ES2021, and ES2020.

???? The New Stack has a story about Meta supporting the OpenJS Foundation – but who wrote the article is what we found more interesting..

The folks at Meta / Facebook have written about the efficiency gains made in Messenger Desktop by moving from Electron to React Native.

One downside to platforms like Cloudflare Workers using V8 isolates has been a lack of support for opening TCP sockets – quite an impediement if you want to talk to a RDBMS over TCP or something. Fear no more, Cloudflare Workers has introduced a connect() API for creating TCP sockets from Workers functions.

Promise.withResolvers progressed to stage 2 at the latest TC39 meeting.

RELEASES:

Node.js 20.2

Rome 12.1
↳ The formatter/linter gains stage 3 decorator support.

Ember.js 5.0 – App framework.

Jasmine 5.0 – Testing framework.

Gatsby 5.10

???? Articles & Tutorials

How to Get Full Type Support with Plain JavaScript — It’s possible to reap the benefits of TypeScript, yet still write plain JavaScript, as TypeScript’s analyzer understands types written in the JSDoc format.

Pausly

TypeScript’s own JS Projects Utilizing TypeScript page has more info on the different levels of strictness you can follow from mere inference on regular JS code through to full on TypeScript with strict enabled.

▶  Coding a Working Game of Chess in Pure JavaScript — No canvas, either. All using the DOM, SVG, and JavaScript. No AI and it’s not perfect, but it’s only 88 minutes long and it’ll give you something to work on..

Ania Kubow

Automate Slack and MS Teams Notifications Using Node.js — Quick guide to send and automate messages via Slack, MS Teams, and any other channel from your Node.js applications.

Courier.com sponsor

Your Jest Tests Might Be Wrong — Is your Jest test suite failing you? You might not be using the testing framework’s full potential, especially when it comes to preventing state leakage between tests.

Jamie Magee

A Guide to Visual Regression Testing with Playwright — The Playwright browser control library can form the basis of an end-to-end testing mechanism all written in JavaScript, and comparing the visual output of tests can help show where things are going wrong.

Dima Ivashchuk (Lost Pixel)

Create a Real Time Multi Host Video Chat in a Browser with Amazon IVS

Amazon Web Services (AWS) sponsor

React Server Components, Next.js App Router and Examples — Addy Osmani’s overview of of the state of React Server Components, the Next.js App Router implementation, other implementations, the move towards hybrid rendering, plus related links.

Addy Osmani

..and if React is your thing, the latest issue of React Status is for you.

???? Code & Tools

VanJS: A 1.2KB Reactive UI Framework Without JSX — A new entrant to an increasingly crowded space, VanJS is particularly light and elegant, and its author has put some serious effort into documenting it and offering tools to convert your HTML to its custom format. It’s short for vanilla JavaScript, by the way.. GitHub repo.

Tao Xin

JavaScript Scratchpad for VS Code (2m+ Downloads) — Quokka.js is the #1 tool for exploring/testing JavaScript with edit-continue experience to see realtime execution and runtime values.

Wallaby.js sponsor

Introducing Legend-State 1.0: Faster State for ReactAnother state management solution? After a year of effort, Legend State 1.0 claims to be the fastest option “on just about every metric” and they have the benchmarks to prove it. Whatever the case, this thorough intro is worth a look. GitHub repo.

Moo․do

Starry Night: GitHub-Like Syntax Highlighting — Apparently, GitHub’s own syntax highlighting approach isn’t open source, but this takes a similar approach and is. It’s admittedly quite ‘heavy’ (due to using a WASM build of the Oniguruma regex engine) but that’s the price of quality.

Titus Wormer

Garph 0.5: A Fullstack GraphQL Framework for TypeScript — Full-stack ‘batteries included’ GraphQL APIs without codegen. GitHub repo.

Step CI

headless-qr: A Simple, Modern QR Code Library — A slimmer adaptation of an older project without the extra code that isn’t necessary today. Turning the binary into an image is your job, or use something like QRCode.js if you want a canvas-rendered QR code out of the box.

Rich Harris

Scroll Btween: Use Scroll Position to Tween CSS Values on DOM Elements — Scrolling/parallax libraries tend to feel the same but this one demonstrates some diverse examples with colors, images, and text — all with no dependencies.

Olivier Blanc

eslint-plugin-check-file: Rules for Consistent Filename and Folder Names — Allows you to enforce a consistent naming pattern for file and directory names in projects.

Huan

Transformers.js 2.0 – Run Hugging Face transformers directly in browser.

PrimeReact 9.4 – Extensive UI component library.

The Lounge 4.4 – Cross-platform, self-hosted web IRC client.

Faast.js 8.0 – Serverless batch computing made simple.

???? Jobs

Find JavaScript Jobs with Hired — Hired makes job hunting easy-instead of chasing recruiters, companies approach you with salary details up front. Create a free profile now.

Hired

Fullstack Engineer at Everfund.com — Push code, change lives! Help us become the center for good causes on the modern web with our dev tools.

Everfund

????‍???? Got a job listing to share? Here’s how.

???? Go with the flow..

js2flowchart.js — A visualization library to convert JavaScript code into attractive SVG flowcharts. Luckily, there’s a live online version if you want to play without having to install anything.

Bohdan Liashenko

Flatlogic Admin Templates banner

Is React a Framework? Software Engineer Answering

By definition – React is one of the most popular JavaScript UI libraries nowadays. It comes in second place after jQuery among all web frameworks! React’s popularity has grown rapidly thanks to a simple and declarative API that allows you to build high-performance applications, and that momentum keeps growing. Still, there is often discussion and questioning that React is a framework or library.

Firstly, let’s look what the differents between framework and library? 

The framework belongs to the main() function. It executes some functions, e.g. controlling a collection of windows on the screen. The framework can, in principle, work even if you have not set it up in any way. It does something, e.g. it places an empty window with default widgets. The framework defines the general nature of the program, and your code provides a specific setting. These settings can be very significant, as both a word processor and a spreadsheet can be created using the same framework.

The library is the set of tools used by your code. Your code belongs to the main() and provides the overall structure of the program. A library performs some specific task, such as sending traffic over a network, drawing charts, or something else. The library can do big things, like draw a view of a three-dimensional space full of objects, but only after you tell it about those objects.

The framework can call your code, which in turn calls the library. But your code never calls the framework, except perhaps for system() or exec() functions.

But, is React a Framework? 

We asked our Software Engineers Team for their opinion and they were split into two parts: some maintain the view that React is a library, and others assign it as a Framework. Here are the most outstanding opinions:

From my point of view, React is not a framework, it’s just a library with no specific requirements for project structure. It’s about describing the abstractions of your application, logic, routing, data exchange, and so on. And React simplifies the work with this data, and optimizes the work with it

Anton M. – Software Engineer at Flatlogic.com

From my point of view, React is not a framework, it’s just a library with no specific requirements for project structure. It’s about describing the abstractions of your application, logic, routing, data exchange, and so on. And React simplifies the work with this data, and optimizes the work with it

I know that react calls itself a “library”, and a lot of developers prefer to react to the home page with the title “library”. However, I think that React is more like a framework now, with different targets like web, react native, etc. And the foundation of React is JSX, which is crucial for proper developer experience, and requires a build step, so you can’t just slap a bunch of JSX files into a browser and call it a day. Nowadays when you say “I built this app with React” you don’t mean that you used it on one page or as a modern jquery alternative. You mean that you built everything around react, with its ecosystem, its best practices, etc. And with all those points in mind, I’d rather call react the framework, than a library

Viktor S. – Staff Engineer at Flatlogic.com

We also conducted the research among others software engineers and would like to share with you the most impressive arguments on this point. 

So, is React a Framework or a Library?

React is a Library

React is a JavaScript library for building user interfaces. It is maintained by Facebook and a community of individual developers and companies. React can be used as a base in the development of single-page or mobile applications.

Now Why Library, not a Framework?

different definitions for library and framework:

a framework is a software where you plug your code into
a library is a software that you plug into your code

In terms of this definition, React is a framework. But some people, especially in the frontend world, say a framework has to bring stuff like routers and/or widgets, etc. 

So Angular, and ExtJS are frameworks, but React isn’t, because it only gives you the means to build components and render them into the DOM.

Let’s make it simple, in React we have to include packages for everything it’s not necessary but yes we can add them, thus React is a Library but if we are not given an option to do so with our code then that’s a framework like Angular and Vue.

React is a library because it’s only supposed to deal with the view part of the eco-system, and you can integrate it easily in any project you’re working on currently, it’s something like jQuery, it only helps you with organizing your views into reusable components, of course, the performance is one of the best things about React, especially with the new Fiber algorithm, things will be faster seeing the scheduler mechanism, unlike Angular, it’s a framework that gives you everything you need, most of the things are already built-in, for React you need to create your own/or grab some modules from npm to add extra functionality as need per your project.

It depends on how you use it. If you’re writing a small program and you structure your program around working with React, you are probably thinking of React as a framework.

If you have a big program and you use React as a small part of it just for handling output, then you’re probably thinking of React as a library.

If your program is 90% user interface, and not only your program structure but your data structures are shaped to fit the React system, then you may even think of React as a language. Hey, if TypeScript can be a language, why not React?

React is a library, cause it has mostly evolved into a vast ecosystem that is barely distinguishable from a framework. A framework protects the edges, whereas a library provides a tool for doing certain tasks. React handles exactly one task: abstracted Web Components. It offers an internal state, lifecycles, and external properties, as well as a renderer for a browser or comparable environment through ReactDOM – and nothing more.

This has a few advantages: it is smaller than a full-featured framework, has fewer opinions on how to address problems, and so provides more options.

I’d say React is a library posing as a framework. It feels like working in a framework (esp. with JSX, though using that is optional), but under the hood, it is just a library. This definition is quite good:

a framework is software that you plug your code into (e.g. you work “inside” it).
a library is software that you plug into your code (e.g. you “hand-off” certain tasks to it, or build “on top” of it).

React feels like the first, but is the second. The attached video compares React and Angular and hints at the distinction. Since React treats your code as a black box, you can push the data-binding concerns out to the edges of your system, to be “handed off” to React (i.e. how you would use a library). Angular, on the other hand, forces you to work “inside” their “scopes” using their “directives” to handle data-binding. In Angular, you are passing your data through scopes that observe your data model. You are always at the mercy of whichever directives they are building into their framework scaffolding. You are also working “inside” HTML (JS-in-HTML), with all the constraints that impose (giving more of a framework feeling). But with React, you have less of that feeling, since you have freedom (full power of JS), and can build “on top” of React (HTML/JSX-in-JS). This is good since JS is inherently more powerful than HTML.

React is a Framework

React is a framework. Honestly caring about the difference between a library and a framework is a bit pedantic, so I’d say you can call it either. Having said that, my definitions of the two words are that a library is a collection of functions, and a framework is a way of doing things.

By this definition, React is a framework because it forces you to build UI in the React way instead of the Angular, etc. On the other hand, the dash is a perfect example of a library because it’s just a collection of functions, use them however you want.

JavaScript is known for its abundance of new plugins, frameworks, and other things created by its massive community of developers and designers.

You must be wondering what this fact has to do with the React JS framework and other frameworks. The truth is that many of the leading IT firms have already embraced JavaScript and leveraged its benefits.

That should answer the question and not cause any other debates, right? Well, not exactly; the debate over Is React a framework or library? is as strong as ever.

Over the years, developers, software engineers, and developer communities came up with pros and cons related to the status of React as a library or React as a framework. Let’s analyze them together.

React as a library

React can be easily swapped by some other javascript library offering similar functionalities.
React can be easily plugged into an existing technology stack – and that’s the definition of a library.

React as a framework

Related libraries must work in an opinionated way.
Because of its state and lifecycle on the components, you inverted the control to React.

Are you asking why React was designed as a library and not a framework [1] or why it is classified as a library and not a framework [2]?

[1] Why it was built that way. A library is something you can add to an existing project to enhance it. It does not impose any restrictions or conventions on your application design and you can supplement it with other libraries of your choice to flesh out your application. There is also a shorter learning curve (usually) on a library as you can add it incrementally to your project. A framework on the other hand implies structure and convention, you need to follow the conventions of the framework. In many cases a framework limits you to working within these conventions – you cannot (or it is difficult) to mix a framework with other code.

There are use cases for each.

[2] Why it is not classified as a framework. Based on the definition of a framework it does not fit the bill – it is a library that is added to your code – it does not impose structure – beyond the use of the library itself and it can be mixed in with other code.

React does not solve any structural or architectural problems on the app level. It provides us with a set of methods for better (in my opinion) handling of the front-end. I remember when jQuery did that back in the day, and how that started the revolution… React is now doing the same, just better.

Because React is a library eventually we got Flux and Redux. Both of them are handling real-world problems that come alongside Scaling. Mare library does not think about that.

React is a framework because Redux is referencing it as one (Source). Ah, as I started to hope that something in life is going to be easy. With React and Redux there is a clear layer of separation between the view and data. That is why React is not a complete framework to solve the entire problem.

Conclusion

Soft engineers spend a lot of time talking about what React is. The answer is important for any React soft engineer, no matter their skill level. That is because it indicates what they should know and how they should work when developing any React application. Depending on who you are, a beginner or an advanced React soft engineer, I hope this thoughtful research will improve your development process as you build your next React project.

The post Is React a Framework? Software Engineer Answering appeared first on Flatlogic Blog.Flatlogic Admin Templates banner

Next.js vs React: Which One to Choose for Your App?

The burning question today is What’s better: React or Next.js? Let’s have a look closely at both, compare them and see the difference between library and framework. In the React world, Next.js is one of the most popular frameworks for “hitting the ground running.”

What is Next.js?

Next.js is an open-source JavaScript framework for developing fast, lightweight, and easy-to-use web applications and static websites (one-pages) using React. Next.js was created by Vercel in 2016. Next.js requires Node.js and can be initialized using npm. There are a lot of reasons why Next.js has such a strong reputation in the world of application development. They are known for being reliable as they offer image optimization, internationalization, zero-config, Next.js analytics, hybrid: SSR and SGG, fast refresh, API routes, TypeScript support, file-system routing, code-splitting and bundling, incremental static regeneration, and built-in CSS support, etc.

Next.js includes all the features needed to build an application. Moreover, the documentation is excellent and it is becoming very popular among developers for frontend development.Here are the most popular platforms and apps of Next.js: Twitch.tv, TikTok, Hulu, Binance, and many others that involve a massive number of users engaging with complex data influxes.

What is React?

React is an efficient, declarative and flexible JavaScript library for building interactive UI, inspired by xHP, the HTML component library for PHP. React was created by Facebook in 2011 and then open-sourced in 2013.React is used to create dynamic, mobile apps, one-pages, visualization tools, and dashboards. Here are some of the most popular platforms and apps created with React: Facebook, Netflix, Atlassian, Airbnb, Dropbox, Reddit, etc.

Next.js vs React

Even in a sea of JavaScript frameworks and libraries, React and NextJS stand out. React is the most popular JavaScript library for frontend developers. NextJS, although smaller than React, has grown continuously over the years and is well on its way to becoming the most-used JavaScript framework. So, let’s compare React and Next.js. React – is a JavaScript library for building UI. Next.js – is the React framework. NextJS is used on top of React, extending its features and optimizing the development process: React doesn’t even have to work with NextJS, but NextJS uses React to deploy applications.

React has a special framework – Create React App, an application used to create React projects and includes tools such as Babel, Webpack, and ESlint. Next.js is a React-based framework that allows you to build applications with server-side rendering. React is still the core of the application, but the structure and navigation mechanisms (architecture) – are defined by Next.js. The difference between a framework and a library is that a framework has more features and focuses on several aspects of development, and gives you rules and guidelines for writing code and structuring files.

Next.js
React & Create React App (CPA)

Server-Side Rendering (SSR)
Supports different types of SSR.
– Static generation: obtaining data at build time. Best suited for use cases such as blogs or static websites.
– Server-side rendering: sampling data and rendering for each request. May be needed when you need to serve different views to different users.
Doesn’t support SSR out of the box. 
However, you can still set it up. 
It just takes more effort to configure SSR with your preferred server and configuration.

Configuration
Almost everything is configurable
If you check the example NextJs templates, you can see files like 
babelrc, jest.config, eslintrc etc. that you can configure.
Doesn’t leave you much space to configure it. 
Configurations, such as webpack config, cannot be changed unless you do not deviate from the usual CRA path (eject, rescripts, rewired, craco). 
You should use what is configured in 
react-scripts, which is the core of CRA.

Maintainability
Well maintained. Release regular updates.
Very sensitive. 
If you keep up with updates of CRA releases, it is not difficult to maintain.

TypeScript

Supports typescript out of the box. 
Configurations for TypeScript:
touch tsconfig.json

Supports. You can initialize the CRA app with typescript like this:
npx create-react-app my-app —template typescript

Hooks Support
Supports
Supports

Redux Support
Supports
Supports

Performance
Incredibly fast apps thanks to static sites and server-side rendering.
Decent, but the lack of code splitting results in poor performance.

Community
Tiny, but friendly
Both huge and friendly

Features
Support static exports, and pre-rendering, and has a lot of features, for example, automatic building size optimization, fast development compilation and preview mode.
Easily extensible, can include routing as well as management patterns with libraries.

Talent pool
Narrow
Broad

Easy to learn
Easy
Easy

Development costs
Low
Low

Which one is better?

It’s hard to say that one is better than the other. Remember, React.js is a JS library – a set of tools you can use to build UI – and Next.js is a framework – the blueprints and rules you need to build an entire app – based on React so it’s not a pick this one instead of the other situation.

Use React when:

You need a highly dynamic routing
You’re already familiar with JSX
You need offline support

Use Next.js when:

You need an all-inclusive framework
You require backend API endpoints
You need server-side rendering

What do React vs Next.js projects look like

React

You can get started with React by installing Node.js on your machine and running npx create-react-app react-app. This will create a basic project structure with the src/App.js file as the entry point for the application. You’ll also have a public folder where you can store assets, and the initial scaffold looks like this:

Next.js

With Next.js, you can get started by running npx create-next-app next-app. This will scaffold out a project that already has a pages folder for the pages or routes and a public directory that hosts your assets. The initial scaffold looks like this:

The files in the pages directory relate to routes in your application. The public directory stores your static files or images that you want to serve and can be directly accessed – no need to use require or other React traditional methods to import images into components.

Building Next.js and React projects with Flatlogic

The Flatlogic platform is a great way to bridge the gap between developing your applications. Applications usually use the same elements and components, when using the same technologies. The main thing that distinguishes them on a technical level is the database schema, which implements different data processing and storage mechanisms. The Flatlogic Platform allows you to create applications by combining parts and creating only those that need to be unique. Here you can see how to use the Flatlogic Platform to create Next.js, React applications, and other options for creating CRUD applications on the React. To generate your Next.js or React application, tap here and let’s go.

Step 1

Name your project and choose the tech stack: React as frontend and No-backend as backend.

Step 2

Choose the Starter Kit. Here you need to decide which starter kit is best for your project: Next.js or Create React App.

Next, you need to connect your GitHub repository and check the stack and starter kit and Finish the creation process.

Then you will be redirected to the project settings where you will need to deploy your application.

Conclusion

React and Next.js are new and useful tools for your project, but only for certain tasks. When you choose Next.js, it offers the best solutions for server-side rendering and static website development. It also makes it easy to manage projects with a variety of tools and features.

On the other hand, React is the best choice for developing UIs for one-page applications. Being mobile and web-enabled, it works with a layer of mobile and web applications to create more appealing and intuitive ones. In a nutshell, Next.js offers various tools and features to minimize the development process while React has better resources for the frontend development of your mobile and web applications.

Suggested Articles

What is Next.js? Top 7+ Next.js Templates
Angular vs React: Which One to Choose for Your Web App
Best Ways to Deploy React Apps

The post Next.js vs React: Which One to Choose for Your App? appeared first on Flatlogic Blog.Flatlogic Admin Templates banner